home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=91TT2291>
- <title>
- Oct. 14, 1991: The Journalist and the Murder
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1991
- Oct. 14, 1991 Jodie Foster:A Director Is Born
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- BOOKS, Page 86
- The Journalist and the Murder
- </hdr><body>
- <p>After deceiving the villain in Fatal Vision, Joe McGinniss errs
- anew by siding with the victim in Cruel Doubt
- </p>
- <p>By William A. Henry III
- </p>
- <p> What Bismarck said of legislation and sausages, one must
- also admit of the more titillating varieties of journalism:
- those who love the product would do well not to examine the
- process too closely. That is especially so with the faddish
- nonfiction genre of factual crime reconstructions, in which, for
- tactical reasons of getting the inside story, authors generally
- ally themselves either with careerist police detectives and
- prosecutors, or with pathetic victims cooperating in a further
- invasion of their privacy, or with criminals. Each bond can be
- unseemly, its results distorting.
- </p>
- <p> Consider Joe McGinniss. When writing about subjects other
- than crime, he led a charmed professional life. The Selling of
- the President, 1968, a savage back-room report on the
- manipulative TV advertising in Richard Nixon's campaign, made
- him, at 26, the youngest U.S. nonfiction writer to top the New
- York Times best-seller list. Other triumphs followed. If
- McGinniss did not quite rank with David Halberstam or John
- McPhee as a chronicler, he stood not too far behind.
- </p>
- <p> Then came Fatal Vision, the biggest hit of his career,
- with an NBC mini-series to boot. The devil's bargain to make it
- happen was that McGinniss had to befriend, become the business
- partner of and even, for technical legal reasons, join the
- defense team of Dr. Jeffrey MacDonald, a man eventually
- convicted of beating to death his pregnant wife and two
- children. Well before the jury spoke, McGinniss had come to
- believe his man was guilty. But to protect the book contract he
- had to keep his subject happy, and he did so, not just by
- concealing opinions but also by telling overt lies. MacDonald
- sued, and after a hung jury, McGinniss and his publisher
- settled, reportedly for $350,000. More humiliation came when
- Janet Malcolm of the New Yorker detailed McGinniss's
- indiscretions in a 1989 article, quoting liberally from his
- letters to MacDonald, including gushing affirmations of belief
- in his innocence, sleazy attempts to muscle out competing
- writers, and financial and sexual confessions meant to induce
- the convicted man to respond in kind.
- </p>
- <p> With his latest venture into fact crime, Cruel Doubt
- (Simon & Schuster; 460 pages; $25), McGinniss has swung to the
- opposite pole. Eleven months after Malcolm's devastating piece,
- he began to write the story of Bonnie Von Stein, a North
- Carolina woman who was unquestionably a victim rather than a
- villain. Her husband was bludgeoned and stabbed to death beside
- her as they lay in bed at home; she too was battered and nearly
- died. Despite her injuries, she was unjustly treated as a
- suspect for many months, as was her daughter. She suffered a
- mother's worst nightmare when her son confessed to devising the
- crime because he wanted his parents' money more than their
- company.
- </p>
- <p> In telling the mother's story, McGinniss cannot be accused
- of glorifying a neurotic criminal. Nor, he is at pains to
- emphasize, can he be charged with exploitation. He did not seek
- out his subject. Rather, she came to him--because, he gloats,
- she so admired Fatal Vision.
- </p>
- <p> The basic problem with the resulting book is that, for all
- the drama in its central character's situation, there is not
- much in the woman herself. She comes across as drab, passive
- and emotionally blocked. Her best quality, stubborn
- persistence, does not lend itself to glamour or theatrics.
- Besides, she was not present--victims rarely are--for the
- key moments in solving the case and preparing for trial. Thus,
- in bringing the story back to her, McGinniss keeps having to
- disrupt its momentum.
- </p>
- <p> There is a subtler, graver flaw, one that readers may not
- recognize unless they pick up another current book about Von
- Stein's case, Jerry Bledsoe's Blood Games (Dutton; 451 pages;
- $22.95). In telling Bonnie Von Stein's story, McGinniss adopts,
- consciously or not, her view that her son was mostly a pawn
- manipulated by dangerous friends. McGinniss stresses the young
- man's weakness of character and instability; he quotes defense
- and prosecution attorneys describing the youth as a "wimp," and
- attempts to establish his two co-conspirators as evil geniuses.
- Even the photograph McGinniss uses shows Von Stein's son as a
- weak-chinned, wide-eyed boy. Bledsoe, whose emphasis is on the
- perpetrators rather than the victims, convincingly evokes in
- words and pictures a much harsher figure, quite capable of
- conniving at murder for gain.
- </p>
- <p> On the whole, Bledsoe's book is livelier, clearer and
- better reported, although it lacks an organizing theme to
- compete with McGinniss's haunting image of a woman being
- victimized over and over. Both books, for example, report that
- the three plotters were enmeshed in Dungeons & Dragons; Bledsoe
- does a far better job of explaining that game. Both books are
- freighted with pointless multigenerational background for the
- main characters, but Bledsoe's is less tedious. Not only are the
- co-conspirators almost ciphers in McGinniss's book, but so is
- the murdered husband Lieth Von Stein, while Bledsoe brings him
- alive.
- </p>
- <p> Mostly, however, the divergence of the books demonstrates
- the journalistic axiom that access is everything. Bonnie Von
- Stein felt abused by the police and prosecutors and didn't like
- the final verdict; she was convinced the wrong youth had been
- named as principal assailant. So McGinniss takes an artificially
- long 200 pages to get anyone arrested and even then keeps
- casting doubt on the official story, to the point of raising
- last-minute doubts about the complete innocence of Von Stein's
- daughter. Bledsoe, however, seemingly had help from the police
- and builds the latter half of his book around the trial. So he
- accepts as valid the very evidence that McGinniss convincingly
- challenges. To read either book is to feel one knows all about
- the Von Stein case. To read both is to know more and be sure of
- much less.
- </p>
-
- </body></article>
- </text>
-
-